Ex-offenders working for Disney??? About This Page:

[Plannergirl]

Im all for 2nd chances, lots of folks make dumb mistakes when they are young, or perhaps to feed their families. I dont want a rapist as my mousekeeper ore a pedophile with a child but I have enough humanity to realise folks change and grow.

[BabieeMelly]

But still, sex offenders didn't just make a dumb mistake.

[DyanKJ130]

[ QUOTE ]
But still, sex offenders didn't just make a dumb mistake.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's true and I am certainly not defending them, but nearly all sex offenders were once the victim of a sex offender themselves. Unless the cycle is broken it just goes on and on.....it's very sad.

[TheGoof]

We either have to as a society accept that ex-cons have to find positions somewhere, and give them the chance, or we need to start our own Australia.

If they can't find legitimate work, they certainly will commit another crime.

You do have to keep certain types of criminals away from certain positions, i.e. child molesters and character positions.

[DrDolphin]

I think that if you don't give former offenders a place to make a good wage so that they do't offend again (if theft, etc was the crime) then you have a vicious cycle. Sex offenders need not apply in my book.

[Huntermom]

Most states prohibit sex offenders from having unsupervised contact with any children, even family members, at least while they're on parole. While offenders are on parole they also have to report their employment to the Parole Officer so that if by any chance one managed to "sneak by" and get into an unsafe position, the PO would be a second safety net and would in all likelihoood have them leave the job. PO's have an obligation not only to their parolees but to the community.

As for offenders charged with non-sex crimes, most are probably drug offenses and I would guess that many committed their crimes at a very young age. If we don't want to keep paying to jail people, we need to let them get jobs. The best way to keep them from re-offending in to make them productive members of society. And many inmates actually use their jail time to better themselves, including getting a better education so that they can get a decent job. Relegating them to landscaping and maintanence is unfair. If they are willing to put the effort into bettering themselves, they should be able to get the job that they are qualified. I have had clients who are very intelligent and once they paid the price for their offense have become very productive members of society.

Stepping off my soapbox,

Diane

[My My oh My! Mickey Rocks!]

[ QUOTE ]
As long as they are backstage cast members (landscaping, etc) I have no problem with it.

[/ QUOTE ]

And, although it was mentioned here already: absolutely NO sex offenders!!!!!!

[iamgrumpy]

I believe they deserve a second chance but if they were in there for something like child abuse or murder or something like that then maybe behind the scenes only?

Amy

[BabieeMelly]

I don't think they should work anywhere, period. I don't get why they give murderers second chances - the innocent person they killed isn't getting one, are they? [img]/ubb/images/graemlins/rolleyes.gif[/img]

And this isn't against you Amy, or anyone! Just my opinion!

[Pooh1219]

[ QUOTE ]
I don't think they should work anywhere, period. I don't get why they give murderers second chances - the innocent person they killed isn't getting one, are they? [img]/ubb/images/graemlins/rolleyes.gif[/img]

And this isn't against you Amy, or anyone! Just my opinion!

[/ QUOTE ]

And what would your suggestion be for released prisoners? Should they just be put back on the street and not allowed to work anywhere for the rest of their lives? It wouldn't be long before they went right back to criminal activity to support themselves. Of course, sex offenders should not be employed in positions at WDW, or anywhere else, where they have close contact with children, but I'm pretty confident Disney is doing their best to insure that doesn't happen. As far as released murderers, that's a whole 'nother topic.

[BabieeMelly]

I was taling about murderers and convicts, not Martha Stewart [img]/ubb/images/graemlins/rolleyes.gif[/img]

[LizardCop]

Might I remind everyone we're talking about ALL ex-offenders, the Ted Bundy's and the Martha Stewart's.

And while I'm at it maybe I should remind everyone that Disney, as do ALL major employers, have been hiring ex-offenders for many, many years.

What is the defination of a murderer? Someone that kills another human being, right??? That would include those that did it accidentally, intentionally, through negligence, or whatever. Society has lessened the harshness of murder by calling it homicide, but it's still murder.

How many murderers are released from prison, very, very few. Less than 1% of the ex-offenders that are released are murderers. How many INTENTIONAL murderers are released from prisons each year, none that I know of, especially if they are convicted of premeditated murder. Last time I checked, intentional murder (1st degree),as well as 2nd degree, has a mandated minimum sentence of life without parole in 50 states...

Sex offenders do compromise a slightly larger percentage, and that percentage is getting higher every year. Not because we have more sex offenders, but because there are so many "classifications" of criminals that now fit into the sex offender catagory.

Child molesters are a different situation all together, especially in Florida (as well as the other 49 states). There are specific laws governing their releases, where they can be, where they can't, who they can work for, how close they can get to anywhere that has children, etc....

BTW, ex-offenders are anyone that was convicted of a crime and put into prison, placed on parole, placed on probation or suffered any consequences for the crime committed. There is not differentiation between the specific crime when you use a generic phrase like "ex-offender".

We all have opinions about this, as with anything else in life. We should respect the opinions of others, whether they agree with ours or not, just as we expect others to respect ours.

None of us are going to make any decisions, or change anything that's going on, or has been going on for a long, long time).

What I find amusing, to a certain extent, is that the intent of the reporter was to get noticed and stir the pot up a little by reporting "old news". They did it, didn't they!!!

[arroyosluvdisney]

Sex offenders have no no no right to be in disneyworld or even on this earth if u ask me.

Ex drug dealers theifs or smaller time criminals who want to change their lives are ok if they are beind the scences

[weroosl]

If you have problems with an erection, the first step to solving them is to search for tips on the Internet from post, and also make an appointment with a urologist or andrologist. As already mentioned, a weak erection is a symptom of many dangerous diseases, from diabetes to cancer. The doctor will conduct the necessary examination - the choice of diagnostic method depends on the general condition of the patient, complaints, anamnesis - and will identify the cause of a weak erection. Perhaps, in addition to the therapy itself, the specialist will advise taking pills for potency. I did so when I had problems of this nature.

[stephaniexm18]

Hot galleries, daily updated collections
http://gay.and.lesbian-events.titsam...om/?post-reyna
full scenes porn free no registration caramel porn star wiki dad and step daughter porn free krystal steel porn vieos porn transexuals powered by vbulletin